xt here}}
> \stopformula
>
> I've tried using \blank and \vspace, but to no avail. For example:
>
> \underbrace{x+y+z}_{\blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}}
> ...does not work.
>
> The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in the
> ContextGarde
:
> >>
> >>> The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...)
> in
> >>> the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to
> find
> >>> any user-supplied arguments for increasing this vertical distance.
> &g
ank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}}
> > ...does not work.
> >
> > The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
> > the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to
> find
> > any user-supplied arguments for increasing this verti
Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 18.12.2023 um 21:55:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Dean Hung wrote:
The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to find
any user
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Dean Hung wrote:
>
> > The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
> > the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to find
> > any user-supplied
pformula
>
> I've tried using \blank and \vspace, but to no avail. For example:
>
> \underbrace{x+y+z}_{\blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}}
> ...does not work.
>
> The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
> the ContextGarden wiki seems to be ver
:
\underbrace{x+y+z}_{\blank[1cm]\mathrm{my text here}}
...does not work.
The documentation on underbrace (and overbrace, underbracket, etc...) in
the ContextGarden wiki seems to be very limited, and I was not able to find
any user-supplied arguments for increasing this vertical distance
Hi Hans,
Thank you very much for the new update.
Everything seem to work like a charm. In particular I played with the
\underbrace and \overbrace when adding something under the \underbrace, or
above the \overbrace, like in
\startformula
\overbrace{1+x^2+a}^{= -1} +
\underbrace{ax^2 + bx + c
} =
\fenced[brace][size=3]{x_3} =
\fenced[brace][size=4]{x_4} =
\fenced[brace]{\blackrule[width=1cm,height=1cm]}
}
\im{
\root[4]{1+x^2+a} +
\frac{1}{1+x^2+a} +
\overparent{1+x^2+a} +
\overbrace{1+x^2+a} +
\overparent{x
, and thus being
able to configure them according to taste/need).
Q2: Do you have any real examples of constructions with \overbar,
\underbar, \overbrace, ... or if you have any strong opinion, please
raise your voice!
Here is a teaser:
\starttext
% in context we put digits in their own class, the next
: Do you have any real examples of constructions with \overbar,
\underbar, \overbrace, ... or if you have any strong opinion, please
raise your voice!
/Mikael
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please
en which I'd need to typeset a genealogical table.
> >
> > Now, the commands \downbracefill and \upbracefill are no context commands.
> > Please, are there correspondings to them?
> $\overbrace{\hbox{}}$
>
> \mathem
ds.
Please, are there correspondings to them?
$\overbrace{\hbox{}}$
\mathematics{\overbrace{\hbox{}}}
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061
On 10/25/2019 4:54 PM, mf wrote:
Hello list,
is there a better way to interlace overbraces and underbraces like this?
\starttext
These are the expressions to combine:
$$\overbrace{a+b+c}+d \quad a+\underbrace{b+c+d}$$
This is the desired result:
$$\overbrace{a+b+c}+d \kern-16mm\underbrace
Hello list,
is there a better way to interlace overbraces and underbraces like this?
\starttext
These are the expressions to combine:
$$\overbrace{a+b+c}+d \quad a+\underbrace{b+c+d}$$
This is the desired result:
$$\overbrace{a+b+c}+d \kern-16mm\underbrace{\hbox to 15mm{ }}$$
\blank
{\tfx
rnative=mp]
\setupmathstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+
{a+b+c+d} \quad
53 \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
54 $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
55 \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
56 $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
57 \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
58 $\overbar
k
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\o
thstackers
[bottom]
[color=darkred,
alternative=mp]
\starttext
$\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \
ons.
MnSymbol font consists of following files in several design sizes:
- MnSymbolA*.tfm - arrows
- MnSymbolB*.tfm - negated (stroked) arrows
- MnSymbolC*.tfm - binary operators
- MnSymbolD*.tfm - relations
- MnSymbolE*.tfm - brackets, braces, parens, sqrt, overbrace, widehat,...
- MnSymbolF*.tfm -
{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
> \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
> $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a
+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d}
gt; \stopuniqueMPgraphic
>
> \startuniqueMPgraphic{math:stacker:\number"2192}
> math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_rightarrow_shape) ;
> \stopuniqueMPgraphic
>
> % so far
>
> \setupmathstackers
> [both] % vfenced]
> [color=darkred,
>alternative=mp]
>
d}$ \blank
$\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad
\doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank
$\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank
$\underleftarrow {a+b+
Am 09.09.2014 um 18:44 schrieb seasoul bioseas...@gmail.com:
Is there an already-exsting or easy way to add annotations to equations, just
something like
annotation1.png
You can use the \underbrace and \overbrace commands.
\starttext
\startformula
\underbrace{f(n)}_{\text{Output
] [underbar] [FE33F]
% [203E]
So I tried my example replacing \underbrace with \underbar but the
alignment comes out fine (and \overbrace works fine too). So that
debugging idea didn't work, except to indicate that something special
about underbrace isn't working right.
Does anyone have suggestions
underextensibles include \underbar:
\definemathunderextensible [vfenced] [underbar] [FE33F]
% [203E]
So I tried my example replacing \underbrace with \underbar but the
alignment comes out fine (and \overbrace works fine too). So that
debugging idea didn't work, except to indicate
in a next version you can do this:
\setupmathstackers[vfenced][hoffset=10pt]
is it looks like these commands have built-in \limits, these are now set
for
\overbrace
\overparent
\overbracket
\overbar
\underbrace
\underparent
\underbracket
\underbar
\doublebrace
\doubleparent
\doublebracket
28 matches
Mail list logo
